One swiss member asked a question we get all the time: Do we actually need a second professional photographer? According to her, both her future husband and the professional photographer think it is fine to not include what individuals in the market call a "2nd shooter," however she's a little less persuaded. "I personally desire to have two professional photographers given that we are preparing at 2 various locations and I want to make sure that we can get photos of everybody preparing," the bride-to-be shares. "Oh, and we welcomed around 350 individuals, I believe a second photographer is a must.".. http://bestofweddingphotography.com/ is a great source for infos too.
You'll desire a 2nd photographer for a lot of practical reasons, and not only the 2 described above (getting willing in 2 different areas and a big number of visitors). You get the point-- numerous things happen simultaneously at weddings and they're all worth catching, from getting all set to the ceremony, cocktail hour and reception.
In our opinion, a second shooter is absolutely worth it, even with a smaller number of guests. Obviously there are a few ways to "hack" the timeline so that a second shooter is a little less required. For instance, coordinate the preparing time so that bridesmaids and the bride are preparing first, then groomsmen, so that one professional photographer can capture both circumstances. Find a lot more info concerning wedding photography in aubonne on that post
If your budget plan is the reason you want to ditch the second shooter, think about cutting down the quantity of time you need your photographer (lots of professional photographers understand this aspect, and will take all the needed photos from the reception right away so you can get on with the party).
